<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UnMarketing &#187; Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unmarketing.com/tag/transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unmarketing.com</link>
	<description>Stop Marketing. Start Engaging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mannequin Networking &#8211; Why Twitter Automation Is Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.unmarketing.com/2010/02/18/mannequin-networking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unmarketing.com/2010/02/18/mannequin-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unmarketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saran Wrap Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best way I can explain Twitter to new folks is to say it&#8217;s like going to a networking event, but it runs 24/7 and you don&#8217;t have to leave home. It&#8217;s a great way to get to know new colleagues, clients and friends. Recently I&#8217;ve been having a lot of &#8220;debates&#8221; with other Twitter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way I can explain Twitter to new folks is to say it&#8217;s like going to a networking event, but it runs 24/7 and you don&#8217;t have to leave home. It&#8217;s a great way to get to know new colleagues, clients and friends. Recently I&#8217;ve been having a lot of &#8220;debates&#8221; with other Twitter folk about automation. There are a bunch of different automation options using 3rd party sites, this post will focus on one strategy: sending absent tweets (tweeting something when you&#8217;re not actually around.) I&#8217;ve heard many reasons why people say you should do this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/iStock_000003791967XSmall.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-407" style="border: 2px solid black; margin: 5px;" title="iStock_000003791967XSmall" src="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/iStock_000003791967XSmall-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>1. It allows you to reach people in other time zones</p>
<p><span id="more-406"></span></p>
<p>2. It allows you to make Twitter scalable</p>
<p>3. You get to build relationships when you&#8217;re not around!</p>
<p>*Sorry, give me a minute*</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m back, I had to go throw-up in a garbage can. Automating tweets means you want people to listen to you, but you&#8217;re not listening to them.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as automated engagement.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as programmed authenticity.</p>
<p>Absent tweeting is dictation, not engagement. Lecturing, not listening.</p>
<p>Automating tweets is like sending a mannequin to a networking event. Stick a post-it note on it, and roll it in, to multiple events around the world! Think of all the Chamber of Commerce mixers you could cover! Different time zones! Let the relationships winfall begin!!! Boooyaa!!!</p>
<p>Obviously you realize why that&#8217;s not a good idea. The initial tweet doesn&#8217;t create the relationship, it&#8217;s the conversation after. That&#8217;s the best part! I&#8217;m not saying don&#8217;t send out &#8220;marketing&#8221; tweets, or pitch a product. I do it. But when I do, why in the name of Sly and the Family Stone would I not want to be around for questions or comments immediately after? Tweets have such a short shelf-life, it&#8217;s the conversation immediately following the tweet that&#8217;s so crucial, and if it&#8217;s a marketing tweet, may help close the sale.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a different story if your account is a feed of events/news and that&#8217;s what people follow for. The problem is when people &#8220;think&#8221; it&#8217;s you tweeting to them, but you&#8217;re not even there. Once they find that out, it could hurt your relationship and your brand. That tweet tells people &#8220;I want the benefit of a relationship, but don&#8217;t want to put the time in to nurture it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I heard Guy Kawasaki talking about this at a recent event. He said to ignore the &#8220;Twitter Nazi&#8217;s&#8221; that tell you what to do, and you should automate a bunch of tweets. Besides the fact I have a huge issue with people using the term &#8220;Nazi&#8221;, the biggest problem is this: people at that event looked up to Guy for guidance and thought &#8220;this is how you become successful at Twitter!&#8221; and I actually read some tweets after saying they were looking forward to automating Twitter! Guy can say and do whatever he wants. What I find wrong is for people just starting out, this won&#8217;t work. You can&#8217;t replicate someone who has hundreds of thousands of followers and a celebrity name to your Twitter account for your home biz. You actually have the advantage of authenticity and one-to-one on Twitter. Why try to be a WalMart when you&#8217;re a small biz? You have the competitive advantage of being you. Automation hurts authenticty.</p>
<p>Relationships take time. If you try to shortcut social media, you&#8217;re shortcutting relationship building.</p>
<p>Agree? Disagree? Comment below!</p>
<p><em>PS &#8211; Finalizing the UnBook Tour in the fall. Ideas for places to stop, organizations/conference I should speak at? Lemme know in the comments or <a href="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/contact/" target="_blank">contact me</a>! Speaker Demo video is <a href="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/services/speaking/" target="_blank">here</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unmarketing.com/2010/02/18/mannequin-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saran Wrap Series &#8211; My Transparency on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.unmarketing.com/2010/01/05/saran-wrap-series-my-transparency-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unmarketing.com/2010/01/05/saran-wrap-series-my-transparency-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unmarketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saran Wrap Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to a new mini-blog series that revolve around transparency in your market/sales called &#8220;Saran Wrap Series&#8221;. Understand that Saran Wrap has nothing to do with this post, or me, I just saw it in the kitchen while writing and realized it&#8217;s transparent and it sounded catchy (see what I did there, I was transparent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to a new mini-blog series that revolve around transparency in your market/sales called &#8220;Saran Wrap Series&#8221;. Understand that Saran Wrap has nothing to do with this post, or me, I just saw it in the kitchen while writing and realized it&#8217;s transparent and it sounded catchy (<em>see what I did there, I was transparent about the blog series title. I&#8217;m cool like dat)</em></p>
<p>************************************************</p>
<p><span id="more-370"></span></p>
<p>Part 1: My Transparency on Twitter</p>
<p>When I started getting some momentum on Twitter, gaining up to 500 new followers a day during the craziest of my tweeting addiction, I turned off notifications of new followers. I couldn&#8217;t keep up with them all. I then had a choice, become a Twitter Diva (or &#8220;Twiva&#8221; if you want to annoy the eggnog out of people) and not follow anyone back, or auto-follow everyone back who followed me. I picked the latter, since I figured it was a nice way to say thanks for following me, and hey, if they followed me they at least have that going for them <img src='http://www.unmarketing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This was a mistake for three reasons:</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_371" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 242px"><strong><strong><a href="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/moo.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-371" title="moo" src="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/moo-e1262712896760-232x300.jpg" alt="" width="232" height="300" /></a></strong></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">A pic of me in a cow costume seemed suitable for #1</p></div>
<p><strong>1. </strong><strong>I followed back spammers/porn accounts and other undesirables</strong>. I got nothing against porn stars. I&#8217;m sure they wake up and put on their latex pants like the rest of us, but I had no desire to hear about the sequel to Long Dong Silver in my tweet stream. Also, on your profile page, it shows a collection of people you&#8217;ve recently began to follow. Some of those profile pics don&#8217;t reflect fondly on your brand, and why are you following @WhipsAndChainsForMen anyways?</p>
<p><strong>2. I ended up following 30,000 people</strong>. I barely look at my &#8220;All Tweets&#8221; screen. I&#8217;ve removed it from Tweetdeck. There is so much noise, that I&#8217;ve had to make custom groups called &#8220;rockstars&#8221; and &#8220;awesomesauce&#8221; to read the tweets of people are learn from/know. I should&#8217;ve stayed selective in those I followed back and now only follow those I learn from/laugh from or that engage with me and I find them interesting (a great tool for that is <a href="http://www.ReFollow.com" target="_blank">ReFollow.com</a> I check off &#8220;Not Following&#8221; and down below check off &#8220;Users who have @ mentioned me&#8221; to see whose been engaging with me but I haven&#8217;t followed.) And don&#8217;t get me started on all the auto-dm&#8217;s it opened me up to. Even after using <a href="http://www.socialtoo.com" target="_blank">socialtoo.com</a> to block most of them, if I get one more &#8220;it lets your Facebook friends find you on Twitter&#8221; DM&#8217;s I&#8217;m gonna start getting all stabby.</p>
<p><strong>3. It was not being transparent. </strong>I was trading authenticity for automation. Efficiency for transparency. People would tweet or DM me that they were flattered I followed them back, and I winced every time. I couldn&#8217;t tell them that it was automated.</p>
<p>Twitter is different than a newsletter. There is a much more personal connection on it. Just like auto-tweeting, which I&#8217;ll go over in the next post in the series, as soon as you throw automation into your relationships, they stop being that. Is it worth deceiving people, if that&#8217;s how they might see it, for the sake of automation? I realized a little too late, my answer is &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s yours? Does it make you feel all warm and fuzzy if someone follows you and you get that notification? How do you feel about people auto-following back? Or any automation? Comment below! And sign-up for updates to get notified when the next post is up! I&#8217;ll cover what other people are doing with automation, and why it can kill your image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unmarketing.com/2010/01/05/saran-wrap-series-my-transparency-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>279</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

